Parental intrusion ruining couples' marital life: Delhi high court
(The HC said parents should…)
NEW
DELHI: The interference of parents in the married life of their
daughters has become a major cause for playing havoc with the lives of
young couples post marriage, the Delhi high court has said.
Expressing concern over rift between couples due to parents' persistent
interference in their daughter's married life, Justice Kailash Gambhir
upheld a lower court's decree of divorce to a man on the ground of his
in-laws' frequent interference in his marital life.
Justice Gambhir said parents should draw a line to let their daughters lead happy married lives.
"All parents guide, teach and discipline their daughters and are
concerned about their welfare after marriage but it is imperative for
parents to draw a line as the prime concern should be that their
daughter is happily settled in a new atmosphere at the husband's place,"
he said.
But, it should not mean day-to-day monitoring of the affairs taking place at the matrimonial home of the daughter, he said.
Parents should not become uninvited judges of problems of their
daughter, become an obstacle in the daughter's married life, plant
thoughts in her mind and gain control over her and promote disharmony in
her family life, the judge said.
"They are expected to advise,
support and believe in their upbringing maintaining a discreet silence
about the affairs of the matrimonial relationship," the court said.
"The present case is an unfortunate example where the parents of the
appellant, instead of putting out the fire have fuelled and fanned it,"
the court said, dismissing an appeal filed by the wife challenging the
lower court's order granting the man decree of divorce.
According
to the husband, the difference with his wife started a few months after
their marriage in 1990 due to frequent interference of his in-laws.
He alleged that he was even hit publicly by his father-in law two years after his marriage.
Seeking decree of divorce, he had approached the court, which allowed
his plea on the grounds of cruelty by his wife due to continuous
interference by his in-laws.
No comments:
Post a Comment